Evaluating Partners in Policy Making

This document dives into the evaluation of Partners in Policymaking, a program designed to empower individuals advocating for better life chances for disabled people. It explores why evaluation matters—addressing funder demands, accountability, program improvement, and maintaining the integrity of the Partners experience. ​ The author emphasizes the importance of thoughtful evaluation methods that respect the program’s identity, avoid tampering with its proven approach, and minimize intrusion into participants’ journeys. ​

Key risks include time demands, potential distortion of the program’s essence, and the danger of external standards misrepresenting outcomes. ​ Instead of rigid metrics, the document advocates for storytelling as a powerful evaluation tool. ​ By collecting and reflecting on participants’ stories, Partners can highlight the diverse ways graduates use the program to create change—whether through personal advocacy, community leadership, or systemic reform. ​ These stories reveal common threads of empowerment, collaboration, and resilience, even amid challenges. ​

The document also warns against oversimplifying outcomes, as success often depends on external factors like local systems. ​ It suggests using Appreciative Inquiry, a method that focuses on strengths and lessons from participants’ experiences, to guide program improvement and communicate value to funders. ​

Ultimately, this thoughtful approach to evaluation reinforces the program’s mission: building a network of relationships that inspire and support lifelong advocacy for disability rights. ​ Readers will gain insights into balancing accountability with preserving the heart of Partners in Policymaking. ​