, “Dissent from Consensus,” offers a thoughtful critique of the National Quality Forum’s (NQF) Interim Report on Person-Centered Planning & Practice. Authored by seasoned advocates and practitioners in the field of developmental disabilities, it challenges the report’s approach to defining and implementing person-centered planning. The authors argue that the report’s framework leans too heavily on administrative systems, rules, and metrics, risking the loss of the human essence of person-centered planning. They emphasize the importance of co-creating meaningful lives with individuals, families, and communities, rather than reducing planning to a standardized, compliance-driven process.
Drawing from decades of experience, the authors highlight the messy, dynamic, and deeply personal nature of effective person-centered planning. They stress that true progress comes from fostering relationships, exploring possibilities, and embracing the unpredictability of life—not from rigid timelines or exhaustive facilitator competencies. The document also critiques systemic barriers like underinvestment in workforce development, risk management policies, and group-based service models that limit individual freedom and opportunities.
Ultimately, the authors position person-centered planning as a catalyst for social and organizational change, rooted in respect, curiosity, and a commitment to building inclusive communities. While they acknowledge the Interim Report’s intent, they dissent from its consensus, offering a heartfelt alternative perspective that prioritizes the lived experiences of people with disabilities and their allies. This is a must-read for anyone passionate about creating a more just and welcoming world.